You are too broke to own a home in America! The typical American household making $50,000 a year cannot afford to purchase the typical $200,000 median priced home without straining their budget.

People continue to scratch their heads as to why regular home buyers in America are unable to enter the housing market. Prices are up but this is mostly because of investor money that is obsessed with chasing yield in a low yield environment orchestrated by the Federal Reserve. The reason home sales figures continue to be weak sans investors is that U.S. households are too broke! We now hear people moaning and complaining that lending standards are too tough because they actually have to document their income and put some skin in the game. Unfortunately, most Americans are living paycheck to paycheck and are using access to debt to live in denial that their standard of living is truly declining. The latest sales figures show that the median priced home in the U.S. is selling for $201,000. This is too high for a household making $50,000 a year (the typical American family). Since the recent increase in prices was largely driven by a voracious demand from investors, regular home buyers are wondering why they are unable to partake in the American Dream of owning a home. First of all, the big American Dream was having a strong and healthy middle class which is quickly shrinking. The reason homeownership is falling in America is that current home values put real estate out of reach for most Americans unless they go into massive levels of debt. Many are too broke to own a home!

Housing values far outpacing overall inflation and income gains

The housing market is quickly outpacing any sort of normal inflationary gains. The BLS CPI measure of course is missing the entire jump from last year because it is focused only on what a home would yield in rent. This is a poor measure but then again, this missed the previous housing bust.

Housing will consume the biggest portion of your income regardless of you being a renter or an actual home owner. Owning a primary residence is not an investment! An investment usually kicks money back your way instead of draining it out of your wallet. Of course there is so much propaganda on owning that people continue to buy even if prices are far beyond their reach.

First, it might be useful to take a look at true housing values via the Case Shiller Index and how they have performed since 2000:

case shiller home prices

The Case Shiller 10 City index has prices up 86 percent from 2000 and 71 percent if we look at the newer 20 City Index:

case shiller 20 city

It would then be useful to see how this compares to the overall inflation rate since 2000:

CPI all items

Source: BLS

That is interesting. According to the CPI we are up 38 percent since 2000. So why are housing prices going up nearly twice the rate of the CPI? Thanks to our current financial system debt is the currency of choice from banks and the system is flooded with easy money. The only problem of course is that banks and investors are crowding out regular buyers in this new market because U.S. households have seen no inflation adjusted wage growth for nearly a generation:

real-household-income

In other words, households are too broke to purchase in today’s market! Even with low interest rates a regular U.S. household cannot buy the median priced home of $201,000 with the median household income of $50,000 without stretching their budget and foregoing retirement planning. It might help to look at a budget for this household:

household-budget-50000

The below budget is examining a household in California. First, good luck finding an affordable house in the state (keep in mind the median income in the state is roughly $60,000 so don’t think it is far off from the above budget). But assume this hypothetical family found a home in a lower priced city of California for $250,000. Can they afford it? No! But of course, we have FHA backed loans that allow people to buy with only 3.5 percent down:

fha payment

This household will be dishing out $1,770 a month, or more than 53 percent of their net take home pay on their housing payment. Most buyers are going in with very little down outside of the big investors. The regular household would be hard pressed for a 10 percent down payment ($20,000) let alone a 20 percent down payment ($40,000). You already see in the budget that this will severely cut into their retirement planning. Most Americans are winging it when it comes to retirement. For those that own, their retirement plan is their home but a home does not throw off income!

I think it is critical to understand what is going on here and that is housing is becoming unaffordable to many throughout the country. Many will take on debt and put every extra penny into their property. They forget to plan for retirement or to save for things outside of housing. This is why we now have an impending retirement crisis on hand. Say you now pay off your home. Great. You still have insurance, taxes, and maintenance forever! Where is your income going to come from in retirement? Certainly not your home unless you sell but then you still need shelter. Most people don’t think this far out and are betting that Social Security will be there for 10, 20, or 30 years of their retirement and will provide them with enough to comfortably get by. That is not going to be the case. The fact that housing values jumped in 2013 because of investor money and regular buyers are out of the market should tell you something else. Most Americans are too broke to buy. Of course many will go into massive debt trying to cling on to the fading ideals of the American Dream. You need to run the numbers carefully and realize that owning a home is not a clear cut decision.

RSSIf you enjoyed this post click here to subscribe to a complete feed and stay up to date with today’s challenging market!

If you enjoyed this post click here to subscribe to a complete feed and stay up to date with today’s challenging market!
TAGS: , , ,




7 Comments on this post

Trackbacks

  1. Roddy6667 said:

    Historically, the typical, median home in the U.S. cost 2.6 times as much as the median annual income (so if the median income in an area was $100,000, the median price of a home would typically be about $260,000. Prices will revert to the mean. They always do.

    May 29th, 2014 at 3:08 am
  2. Roddy6667 said:
  3. Roddy Pfeiffer said:

    The price-to-income ratio looks at the total cost/price of a home relative to median annual incomes. Historically, the typical, median home in the U.S. cost 2.6 times as much as the median annual income (so if the median income in an area was $100,000, the median price of a home would typically be about $260,000.
    If the median household income is $50,000 the median house should cost $130,000.

    May 29th, 2014 at 6:41 pm
  4. H.H.Silver said:

    Correct on all points. Be aware that property taxes in municipalities are slowly increasing. You may ask on what basis. Your values are still down in the gutter. The reason is these taxing authorities are using all those “investor” home purchases to pretend that there is demand…(from somewhere). So be prepared for higher taxes based on BS.

    June 1st, 2014 at 11:09 am
  5. Roddy Pfeiffer said:

    Municipalities have very few sources of revenue. Outside of speeding tickets, property tax is their only source. With the growing number of municipal employees retiring and receiving Rolls Royce pensions that include paid health care, be prepared for a shock.

    June 2nd, 2014 at 1:47 am
  6. john said:

    What about purchasing an owner-occupied rental property?

    I’m looking at the purchase of a property that has a house, a 4-plex, and a duplex all on the same acreage (1.1 acres in city limits, 7 minutes from high-tech business community). It is a private sale and the price is $500k (20-30% under current market value). All units are currently (and historically) rented out and after payments, insurance, property tax, and some utilities, the property still has a positive cash flow (especially if I paid rent to myself while living there) with 10% down on a 5% note. I know that there are a lot of other numbers that factor in here, but what is your assessment of a situation like this? What hidden dangers could I be missing? Your answers are very much appreciated!

    June 2nd, 2014 at 10:12 am
  7. H H Silver said:

    John: Not knowing where this property is, and what the condition is on all different buildings on the property, it is difficult to give a one size fits all answer.
    1. How close are these rentals to a major metro area ?
    2. Do the buildings need repair ? (new roofs,plumbing, electrical,ect) Huge expenses here.
    3. What are the property taxes concerning rental property ? Usually they are taxed at a higher rate.
    4. How stringent are the tenant laws in this area. This can be a real headache.
    If close to a major metro area, it is possible that you will have to deal with less than desirable tenants. The kind that call you in the middle of the night to check out a water heater or some other minor matter. They could be section 8 renters, in which case that can spell bad news for you.Remember, that just because there is a high-tech industrial park nearby, that doesn’t mean that those good paying job’s will be your tenants.

    June 3rd, 2014 at 4:18 pm

LEAVE A COMMENT

Subscribe Form

Subscribe to Blog

Categories

Archives