Bread, butter, and food stamp economy: Is the US developing a permanent under-class of citizens economically?

The American economy has developed a deep disconnect between its financial markets and the working and middle class.  The stock market has soared by 138 percent from the low reached in 2009.  Yet very little of this has trickled down to the majority of Americans.  In fact, most Americans actually saw little to negative growth in their net worth over this period.  Even more problematic is the emergence of a permanent working poor in spite of a booming stock market.  Over 47 million Americans are still receiving food stamps on a monthly basis.  Not only has this number remained high, there is now an economy that is building up around servicing the needs of this large constituency.  Why wouldn’t there be a new booming market here?  Nearly one out of every six Americans is on food assistance in the most prosperous country in the world.  Doesn’t exactly go hand and hand with the perception of a record breaking stock market.  Is the US and the current economy developing a permanent under-class of citizens?

The boom in food stamp participation

What is fascinating is that the boom in food stamp usage coincided with the massive rally that started in 2009.  The recession officially ended in the summer of 2009 but take a look at this chart:

food stamp usage

Source:  SNAP

Since the recession ended, we have added over 17 million Americans to the food stamp program.  This was a 56 percent rise during a time that the stock market rose by 138 percent.  Yet a large part of the rise has occurred courtesy of the Federal Reserve allowing banks to borrow for very little and allowing for the same kind of speculation to occur once again that led to the initial financial crisis.  The Fed’s balance sheet currently stands at $3.38 trillion:

Fed balance sheet

The expansion is fascinating because it allowed banks to offload non-performing and sluggish loans and freed up leveraging capabilities so the large financial institutions could go back to speculating in global markets.  American households are still in a process of debt deleveraging.  Yet it is abundantly clear that very little of this freed up money flowed into the working and middle class.  In reality more and more of the wealth in the country is flowing into the hands of a few:

share of net worth

In 1989, 32 percent of all the wealth in the US was held by those in the 0 to 90 percentile of income.  Today it is merely 25 percent.  And the top one percent is holding a much larger share showing that the inequality when it comes to wealth is only getting larger.

Another point to make is that most Americans do not own any sizable amount of stocks or investments.  Most Americans derive whatever net worth they have from housing.  Yet in a low yield environment the Fed has created an incentive for Wall Street to invest in residential real estate again but this time crowding out regular buyers.  Even with that said, the gains in housing pale to what has occurred in the stock market recently:

case shiller and stock market

At the height of annual gains the S&P 500 was going up at an annual rate of more than 60 percent.  This is how the S&P 500 was able to soar by 138 percent just from the recent lows in 2009.  Yet many of these gains have come at the expense of slashing wages, cutting costs, and passing on fewer and fewer of the gains to workers.  Keep in mind many of these large companies and financial institutions required every sort of bailout from the American people yet now, are largely in a position to squeeze them even further.  Corporate welfare.

It is hard to see what will reverse this trend of a shrinking middle class.  Many estimates assume that food stamp usage will remain high for many years to come.  Bread, butter, and food stamps.  At least this recipe seems to work for a boom in the stock market.

RSSIf you enjoyed this post click here to subscribe to a complete feed and stay up to date with today’s challenging market!

If you enjoyed this post click here to subscribe to a complete feed and stay up to date with today’s challenging market!
TAGS: , , , , ,




4 Comments on this post

Trackbacks

  1. Robert Cook said:

    Even if were assumed that the “real” wages of the 90% were static, it seems likely that the large baby boomer cohort, many of whom will be retiring or will have less work or less remunerative work, will consume much or all of whatever savings they have, and thus there will be an inevitable fall in the percentage of the wealth held by that 90%. Such direct financial assistance as they receive from their children will compound the decline in wealth.

    June 6th, 2013 at 8:46 pm
  2. Gringo Bush Pilot said:

    Underclass citizens – you bet there are. The problem is; the young people entering the work force today have no real time experience to really gauge how their financial lives differ from Americans 30-years ago.
    Many people, that are not Americans by birth, puzzle in wonderment on the simple fact, that most Americans accept this state of affairs, and continue to suffer this injustice.
    Americans accept this robbery of their birthright quietly – when in other nations, the people would be up in arms.
    I wish them luck … they are going to need it.

    June 7th, 2013 at 4:51 am
  3. 66ragtop said:

    You call them an underclass. I call them the democrat voting bloc in waiting. It has reached the point where the annual ‘benefit’ now received in my state exceeds $50k for a family of four. These folks will never vote to remove themselves from the roles. Further, if the ARE removed, they will simply ease on over to the SS disability teat.

    June 9th, 2013 at 2:29 pm
  4. sharonsj said:

    If it wasn’t for food stamps, I and many of my friends and acquaintances would be on the street or starving. Some of us get Social Security, but it’s not enough to live on. I also have numerous friends who are disabled, and their average disability payment is about $700 a month. Food stamps enable them to stay healthier.

    All of us were once middle class, but many developed medical problems or just can’t earn enough to pay bills. The fact that so many people need food stamps is scary, but as long as the government denies we have price inflation (which accounts for all of us needing help to survive), I don’t see any alternative. And if you take away food stamps, you’re going to see a lot of desperate people taking to the streets.

    June 10th, 2013 at 10:04 am

LEAVE A COMMENT

Subscribe Form

Subscribe to Blog

Categories

Archives