Employment a Lagging Indicator? Not Always. Using Outdated Economic Data and Trends for Future Financial Models. Just Because Stocks Rebound doesn’t Mean the Fundamentals are Good.
- 2 Comment
The markets are continuing on an unrelenting upward movement since their March 9th lows. This is a strong rally that has now seen the S&P 500 jump up by 25 percent in the matter of a few weeks! This kind of market volatility is reserved for highly volatile and troubled markets. It is a rare occurrence to see this kind of quick burst to the upside in more stable and solid bull markets. In addition, the rally is being spurred on by “not so bad” news while the core economic fundamentals are still horrible. Take unemployment for example. This is probably the best indicator of how people and families “feel” the actual recession. The fact that the market is now up 25 percent does very little for the average American family.
As you can see from the chart above, jobless claims are moving up on a continual basis. Unemployment insurance claims are at the highest ever. On a percentage basis, we are already getting into the 1982 recession territory which signals that this has further to go. But there is a new mindset making the rounds. And that is an assumption that the stock market always rebounds and bottoms before the unemployment scene. This is the case for many previous recessions but that is assuming that this recession is standard and falls in line with those historical trends:
*Source: Zero Hedge
That isn’t always the case necessarily. Take a look at the above chart which has recessions measured with unemployment and the S&P 500. In most cases, it is true that the S&P 500 hits bottom first and unemployment keeps rising before topping out. Yet this can mean many different things. We already expect unemployment to be at least 9 percent nationwide and we already know the U-6 which is a more accurate measure already has unemployment near 15 percent. So the argument that unemployment is a lagging indicator is true but the way the market is reacting is that the 2nd half of the year will have us in full recovery and assuming this recession is one of your typical bread and butter recessions. It is not. This is at levels unseen since the Great Depression and there are many reasons to believe we have yet to see the actual bottom even in stocks. The market is currently rallying because of:
-$1 trillion via the Private Public Investment Program
-$700+ Billion Stimulus Program
-$700 Billion TARP
-$10+ Trillion in commitments to the markets through various programs
Yet the fundamentals are still lagging. If this plan doesn’t work, we have just assured ourselves of a Japanese style decade long stagnation.
The above chart is very telling. But let us look at the Dow during the Great Depression:
This chart helps put things into a nice perspective. Keep in mind unemployment was extremely low in 1929, peaked in 1933 and remained high (+15%) until our involvement in World War II in 1941. And even though the market rallied off those 1932 lows, it took almost 25 years for the Dow to see that 1929 peak once again. Are you willing to wait 25 years to see the S&P 500 back up to 1576 or the Dow hitting 14,000 again? That is the perspective you need to take. And we are still in that period where unemployment IS rising. We have yet to see any peak in that regard. And it would be too early to say that the 676 S&P 500 of March 9th was the actual low of lows. Who really knows? Yet first quarter earnings are coming out soon and with the mark to market accounting being eased, we can expect some major fudging to go around. So we may see companies firing people left and right yet earnings will somehow be mysteriously good. Keep an eye on the fundamentals. This time is different.